A challenging issue in COVID-19 infection: The relationship between PA1-1 and TAFI levels in patients with coagulation disorder: A retrospective and observational study.

COVID-19 disrupts the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Especially in the clinical course of serious disease, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), and tissue plasminogen activator levels increase in association with hypercoagulable state and hypofibrinolysis. This explains the increased incidence of thrombosis seen in COVID-19 infection. In this study, we aimed to examine the changes in PAI-1 and TAFI levels of COVID-19 patients. Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital-Ankara Turkey, between April 1 and May 7, 2021. Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in this retrospective study. TAFI and PAI-1 levels were analyzed from the samples that had been stored at -80 °C formerly. One hundred thirty-five patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and followed up in the service or intensive care unit were included in the study. Thirty-four (25.2%) patients required follow-up in the intensive care unit. Mortality rate was 10.4%, the coagulation tests of these patients were also compared. PA1-1 levels were found to be statistically significantly higher in intensive care unit patients (median: 133 pg/mL vs 31 pg/mL; P < .001), and there was no significant difference in TAFI levels (median:7.31 ng/mL vs 9.80 ng/mL; P = .171) between the 2 groups. TAFI levels were found to be higher in patients who died. In COVID-19 infection, as the severity of the disease increases, the coagulation balance deteriorates and eventually a hypercoagulable state occurs with an increase in PAI-1 and TAFI levels. Markers such as PAI and TAFI can be illuminating in further studies in determining prognosis and mortality and developing new treatment options.

Change in Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Titers After Chemotherapy in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

Background The change in hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titers after chemotherapy (CT) in patients with hematological malignancy, affecting factors, and its clinical implications have not been sufficiently understood. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the change in anti-HBs titers and hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) after CT. Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients with hematological malignancies who received CT between 2013 and 2021. All patients were followed up for HBVr and a change in anti-HBs titers for one year. Results Overall, 192 patients were included. In total, 33.9% of the patients were anti-HBs (+) and 26% of the patients were anti-HBc (+) ± anti-HBs (+). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis was given to 35 (70%) of 50 Anti-HBc (+) patients. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir prophylaxis were initiated in 25 (71.4%) and 10 (28.6%) patients, respectively. A significant decrease was found in anti-HBs titers of all patients (p=0.017). A significant decrease was also found in anti-HBs titers of HBc IgG (+) patients and those who received four or more courses of CT (p=0.025; p=0.041). HBVr was not diagnosed in any of the patients. Conclusion Chemotherapeutic agents administered for hematological malignancy have serious immunosuppression effects. In these patients, anti-HBs titers may decrease or become negative one year after CT. Anti-HBs titer before CT or its change after CT may not constitute a risk for HBVr patients who received HBV prophylaxis in line with current guidelines and these recommendations.

The outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the malignancy-related clinical course and overall survival, and to determine the factors affecting mortality. Methods: This retrospective study included 77 patients with hematological cancer and COVID-19. Patients were sub-grouped for analysis as survivors and non-survivors. Results: COVID-19 was seen more frequently in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Mortality rate due to COVID-19 was 20.8%. No statistically significant difference was determined between the survivor and non-survivor groups with respect to age and gender, presence of any comorbidity, leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte values. Platelet count and hemoglobin count were significantly lower in the group with mortality than in the group with recovery. Conclusion: It should be kept in mind that low hemoglobin and platelet levels contribute to mortality. In addition, it is important to protect patients with hematological cancer from COVID-19 and undertake effective vaccination due to its mortal course.

Vitreous hemorrhage: A rare ophthalmic adverse effect due to imatinib treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Imatinib is generally well tolerated by patients. The most common ophthalmic side effects are eyelid edema and periorbital edema. Other side effects which occur at rates of <1% include blepharitis, blurred vision, conjunctival hemorrhage, conjunctivitis, retinal hemorrhage, etc. An uncommon case is here reported of a 51-year-old male with chronic myeloid leukemia who developed vitreous hemorrhage due to imatinib after 9 months of treatment. CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old male with leukocytosis detected in the blood test examination was referred to the Hematology Department. The bone marrow biopsy result was compatible with chronic myeloid leukemia. Imatinib treatment (400 mg/day) was started. In the ninth month of imatinib treatment, the patient complained of a sudden decrease in vision. Vitreous hemorrhage was detected in the left eye and the patient underwent surgery. Vitreous hemorrhage recurred 1 month after the operation. On the fourth day after the discontinuation of imatinib treatment, the patient's ophthalmic complaints improved significantly. The Naranjo algorithm was applied and a score of 9 was detected. The vitreous hemorrhage of the patient was attributed to imatinib, and so the treatment of the patient was switched to bosutinib. DISCUSSION: Imatinib is an oral signal inhibitor that targets tyrosine kinase for BCR/ABL, platelet-derived growth factor, stem cell factor, and c-kit (CD117). The conjunctiva and sclera have a large amount of c-kit positive mast cells which are inhibited by imatinib. The inhibition of c-kit positive mast cells by imatinib may be responsible for further exposure of the conjunctival mucosa to injuries.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis due to ruxolitinib treatment: A rare adverse effect.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is characterized by myeloid cell proliferation and prominent bone marrow fibrosis. Ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of JAK 1 and 2, significantly reduces constitutional symptoms and spleen size compared with placebo, and has significant clinical benefits in patients with myelofibrosis. The most common haematological side effects are thrombocytopenia and anaemia, and the most common non-haematological side effects are grade 1-2 diarrhoea and pyrexia. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis is small vessel vasculitis, characterized histopathologically by immune complex-mediated vasculitis of the dermal capillaries and venules in the lower extremities, which can be seen as palpable purpura. Although the cause is 50% idiopathic, the aetiology of leukocytoclastic vasculitis can be collected under many headings. CASE SUMMARY: The case is here presented of a patient with PMF who developed leukocytoclastic vasculitis after ruxolitinib treatment. Ruxolitinib was discontinued as the lesions were thought to be drug-related and all skin lesions disappeared approximately 2 months after termination of the drug. When the ruxolitinib treatment was restarted at the same dose (2 × 15 mg), the skin lesions recurred. The drug dose was reduced to 1 × 15 mg, and the rashes disappeared. Currently, the patient has no active complaints and is being followed up with ruxolitinib 1 × 15 mg without any complications. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, leukocytoclastic vasculitis due to ruxolitinib is extremely uncommon. This case report can be considered to contribute to the literature of this rare event.